Esos lobbies de moda

Además de la entrada de Abramof en prisión acusado de un delito de tráfico de influencias y de interesantes análisis que señalan la corrupción como el elemento más determinante de las recientes elecciones Usa. El NYT analiza como el cambio de poder ya está teniendo consecuencias en la práctica de los lobbies.

November 15, 2006
As Guard Changes in Congress, Lobbyists Scramble
By JEFF ZELENY

WASHINGTON, Nov. 14 — Republicans do not cede control of Congress for nearly two months, but money, power and influence are already beginning to change hands. The political economy, at least here in the capital, is humming for Democrats.

Democratic lobbyists are fielding calls from pharmaceutical companies, the oil and gas industry and military companies, all of which had grown accustomed to patronizing Republicans, as the environment in Washington abruptly shifts.

Take, for example, Vic Fazio, a California Democrat who rose through the ranks of Congress and reveled in the majority for all but 4 of his 20 years in office. In his second career as a lobbyist, Mr. Fazio did not experience the pleasures of Democratic rule — until now. Suddenly he is in demand.

For Mr. Fazio, who is close to Representative Nancy Pelosi, the California Democrat who is set to become House speaker, the power switch is, quite simply, good for business. Companies are scrambling to fortify lobbying teams with well-connected Democrats.

While Mr. Fazio declined to divulge his still-evolving list of prospective new clients at the law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, he said he intended to bring in Democratic reinforcements to cover the load. “I’ll just have more to do and have a little more help to do it,” he said.

The Republican Party lost its grip on Congress and is now bracing to lose its hold over K Street, the bustling corridor that has become synonymous with the lobbying industry. The so-called K Street Project, an effort engineered by Republicans to dominate the trade, is unraveling, and Democrats say they intend to pass sweeping reforms rather than reverse the project for their benefit.

Democrats say the changing of the guard provides a raft of opportunities, second only to winning the presidency.

Former members of Congress who left Washington have placed confidential calls to headhunters, wondering whether firms are hiring. (They are.) Former staff members have fielded inquiries from lobbying shops that have an urgent need for people with current contacts and old relationships with Democratic leaders. One prominent lobbyist said a former Senate aide was offered a starting salary of $500,000.

Though this is the moment Democrats have been craving — winning a majority so they can help shape politics and policy — some senior aides are now tempted to leave Capitol Hill to become lobbyists and potentially quadruple their salaries. At the same time, some Republicans began receiving materials on unemployment benefits this week as the party sheds thousands of jobs, relinquishing staff committee assignments and leadership posts in both chambers for the first time in 12 years.

“If you’re a Democrat, it’s a good time to be looking for work,” said David Urban, a Republican who is the managing director of American Continental Group, a bipartisan lobbying firm. “For Republicans, there is a little bit of panic that sets in when people realize they have to move out of their office into a cubicle.”

At the offices of Tongour Simpson Holsclaw, a Republican firm, an unusual number of Democrats have been calling in recent days. The phones began ringing after the company’s founder was quoted in Roll Call, a Capitol Hill newspaper, saying it was “a seller’s market for Democratic staffers.” It was, said Mike Tongour, as though he had placed a giant help-wanted ad.

“Several Democrats said, ‘I hear you are interested in expanding your firm,’ ” Mr. Tongour said, recalling his post-election conversations with several senior Democratic aides. “You got the sense that they are going to be asking for premiums.”

Even though most firms are bipartisan, the shift in the balance of power has resulted in a shift of responsibilities between Republicans and Democrats.

“I’ve told my Democratic partners it’s time for them to buy some suits,” said Wayne Berman, a well connected Republican lobbyist. “I went out and bought two new fishing rods and looked into yoga classes.”

He was joking, sort of.

Even before Election Day, the pharmaceutical industry hired Democrats to bolster its public relations efforts, hoping to ease the blow if Republicans lost their majority and Democrats followed through on pledges to let the government negotiate prescription drug prices.

“You literally have to create war games to plan for worst-case scenarios,” said Ken Johnson, the vice president for government affairs at the leading trade association for drug companies. “We’ve got a lot of friends on the Democratic side, but clearly we need some more.”

Acquiring those friends, however, may not be easy.

Steve Elmendorf, a longtime senior adviser to former Representative Richard A. Gephardt who began working as a lobbyist at Bryan Cave Strategies in 2005, said Democrats in the House and the Senate would operate differently.

“The Republicans’ view of lobbying is we give people money, we buy them lunch and then go up and tell them what to do,” said Mr. Elmendorf, whose client roster included Shell Oil and Ford before the election and has grown since then. “We go in and make public policy arguments. The business community is going to have to reorient their view.”

As Democrats prepare for January, implications of a change in power extend across Washington.

Lawyers say they expect their business to increase if House Democrats follow through on their pledge to investigate the Bush administration. Real estate agents paid careful attention to the election results, too, sending welcome packets to newly elected Democrats.

“Because both the House and the Senate went to the Democrats, there will be a new wave and new energy,” said Michael Rankin, managing partner of the Washington office of Sotheby’s International Realty. “A lot of people from around the country will be coming to Washington.”

Ivan Adler, who oversees lobbyist headhunting in the Washington office of the McCormick Group, an executive search firm, said he had received calls from former members of Congress and others outside Washington “inquiring what the job market is like in the new Democratic world.” Mr. Adler declined to name them, citing confidentiality requirements, but he conceded that not all would make good lobbyists.

“They are all popcorn in the pan — some pop and some don’t,” Mr. Adler said. “Hopefully you pick ones that would pop.”

Though the supply and demand of lobbyists is shifting, well-connected Republicans have hardly been put out of work, particularly given the narrow majority in the Senate. Many lobbying firms, recoiling from a year of controversy and scandal, sell continuity as the most valued asset.

“As we move into a new Congress, people are wiser and they learn to distrust quick fixes,” said Nick Allard, a Democratic lobbyist at Patton Boggs, the city’s largest firm. “That’s one reason why the lobbying scandal fell apart like a political Ponzi scheme: it oversold the notion of political access.”

Two days after the election, when it first became clear that the levers of power were shifting, a team of lobbyists at Patton Boggs prepared an analysis of what its clients could expect from a Democratic takeover.

To place the change of power in perspective and to lighten the mood, they opened with the timeless tale from Dr. Seuss: “If I ran the zoo.”

Jim Rutenberg contributed reporting.

¿quién es quién? Los lobbys se disfrazan de ongs, y las ong ejercen de lobby


Desde hace un tiempo no veo nada claro la clásica distinción entre lobbies y grupos ciudadanos, que se distinguen única y exclusivamente por el carácter profesional de los primeros, frente al supuestamente carácter social de los segundos. Los lobbies serían aquellos que cobran de un tercero por realizar su trabajo de lobby y los segundos los que realizan este mismo trabajo en defensa de intereses propios.

La primera consecuencia de esta distinción clásica es poner en la proa jurídica y mediática a los lobbies y llenar de parabienes a los grupos sociales, máximos exponentes de la democracia deliberativa, adalides de la regeneración democrática. Así los verdaderos perjudicados son aquellos que, por carecer de conocimientos, contactos… y otro tipo de recursos propios para realizar esta labor de lobby, tuvieron que acudir a terceros. Da igual que sus intereses sean la defensa de la naturaleza, el fin del hambre en el mundo o el tráfico de armas, su «delito» es que pagan a un profesional para realizar el trabajo que ellos no pueden hacer y por eso son objeto de un estricto control por parte de las autoridades. Un control del que están exentos aquellos que en nombre propio y con sus propios recursos defienden sus intereses que, una vez más, da igual que sean a defensa de la naturaleza, el fin del hambre en el mundo o el tráfico de armas,(los mismos para que nadie me acuse de demagogia).

De esto se han dado cuenta muchos hace tiempo y prefieren convertirse en ongs antes que en lobby. Así lo cuenta hoy el Washington Post (lo cito integro porque no tengo el link):

Foreign Lobbies Took the Guise Of Nonprofits
By James V. Grimaldi and Susan Schmidt
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, November 3, 2006; A01

Early last year, two little-known nonprofit groups paid for Rep. John T. Doolittle (R-Calif.) and his 12-year-old daughter to travel to South Korea and Malaysia. Their last stop was the Berjaya Beach & Spa Resort on the Malaysian island of Langkawi, where they bunked at an oceanfront chalet staffed with a personal butler, got massages and rode water scooters on Burau Bay.

Doolittle’s junket, which cost $29,400, was among the most expensive privately sponsored trips by members of Congress in recent years. The two groups that split the bills were not ordinary nonprofits. They were fronts for vigorous lobbying campaigns bankrolled by foreign entities and were operated by a Washington lobbying firm, Alexander Strategy Group, according to public records and people who worked with the firm.

For five years beginning in 2001, the Korea-U.S. Exchange Council and the U.S.-Malaysia Exchange Association treated 12 members of Congress and 31 Capitol Hill staffers and their relatives to nearly $500,000 in trips that included stops at U.S. and overseas resorts, records show.

The two nonprofits and the lobbying firm behind them have drawn the attention of the FBI. People associated with Alexander Strategy, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said federal investigators have asked them whether the groups were conduits for a foreign government and a foreign corporation to finance congressional junkets.

Records show that the Korea-U.S. Exchange Council was funded by the Hanwha Group, a South Korean conglomerate. The stated goal was to enhance the influence of Hanwha’s chairman, Seung Youn Kim, a controversial figure once jailed for violating Korean financial law in his purchase of Sylvester Stallone’s Hollywood mansion. Lobbyists for the U.S.-Malaysia Exchange Association filed reports stating that their funds came from a Malaysian energy firm and that the work was «on behalf of the government of Malaysia.»

Federal law prohibits members of Congress from knowingly accepting overseas travel from foreign governments except as part of a cultural interchange program approved by the State Department. The travel in this case was not part of such a program, government officials said. House rules ban members from taking trips paid for by lobbyists or foreign agents. Nonprofits and their officers are prohibited under federal tax law from using a charitable organization for private commercial gain.

Once a major lobbying firm, Alexander Strategy Group closed down early this year. Its owner, Edwin A. Buckham, former chief of staff to now-departed House majority leader Tom DeLay, is under investigation in the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal, according to lawyers and witnesses with knowledge of the probe. Authorities are also reviewing Buckham’s use in the 1990s of another nonprofit, the U.S. Family Network, the sources said.

The Korean and Malaysian nonprofits were created in 2001. Their combined budgets of more than $2.5 million, as well as their checkbooks and operations, were controlled by Alexander Strategy, according to people affiliated with the firm at the time. Records show that Alexander Strategy took in $620,000 in fees for its work on the Malaysia account. A Hanwha subsidiary in the United States, Universal Bearings Inc., paid the lobbyists $940,000 for the Korea work.

The nonprofit groups, on the strength of Buckham’s GOP connections, sponsored trips for Republican House members DeLay; Doolittle; Ileana Ros-Lehtinen , Ander Crenshaw and Tom Feeney of Florida; John Carter of Texas; Scott Garrett of New Jersey; and Roger Wicker of Mississippi.

Buckham had a strategic alliance with a Democratic lobbying firm, the Harbour Group, located in the same building on K Street. Harbour received about $500,000 in fees from the two nonprofits, according to tax and lobbying disclosure records. The firm arranged for trips taken by Democrats including Rep. Earl Pomeroy of North Dakota, Rep. Jim McDermott of Washington, Rep. Mike Honda of California and Del. Eni F. H. Faleomavaega of American Samoa. Harbour also arranged for former president Bill Clinton, who was on his own Asian trip, to meet with Hanwha officials in Seoul and Beijing.

Some of the lawmakers on the trips were in positions to help other Alexander Strategy clients. Doolittle, who serves on the House Appropriations Committee, told The Washington Post this year that from 2002 to 2005 he sponsored $37 million in spending-bill earmarks that went to a firm controlled by a key Alexander Strategy client. The client, Brent R. Wilkes, is a target of the federal investigation stemming from the bribery case and guilty plea of former representative Randy «Duke» Cunningham (R-Calif.). Doolittle’s wife, Julie Doolittle, was hired by Alexander Strategy to help keep the books for the Korean nonprofit.

Buckham and Edward Stewart, who had been his top associate at Alexander Strategy, declined to be interviewed for this article.

Joel Johnson, a former senior adviser in the Clinton White House who ran Harbour Group at the time, said he was a subcontractor to Buckham’s firm and thought of the work as lobbying for business interests behind the nonprofits.

Johnson said he relied on Buckham’s assurance that the groups were proper. «This did not look like a fly-by-night operation, because it had very respected, prominent people on board,» he said.

Doolittle spokeswoman Laura Blackann said last week that the congressman believed that his trip to Asia, in February 2005, was proper and that it had nothing to do with the earmarks. He said he paid out of his own pocket for some of the activities on Langkawi, such as the massages and watercraft rentals.

Other members of Congress said they did not know the source of funding for the nonprofits. Said Mike DeCesare, spokesman for McDermott, «Obviously if Congressman McDermott knew, he wouldn’t have taken the trip.»

Helping Chairman Kim
During its five years of existence, the Korea-U.S. Exchange Council described itself in its tax returns as an educational group that spent nothing on lobbying.

But its filings with the Justice Department contradicted those returns. The council registered with Justice as a foreign agent, saying that it was financed by Hanwha Group and that Kim chaired its board of directors. It filed a plan detailing Alexander Strategy’s lobbying campaign for Kim, which promised him extensive contacts with Washington lawmakers and policymakers.

The plan stated that the purpose was «to define Chairman Kim of the Hanwha Group as the leading Korean business statesman in U.S.-Korea relations» and to strengthen «Hanwha’s global position.» A 2002 audit of the nonprofit by the accounting firm Gelman, Rosenberg and Freedman said «approximately 99.9 percent» of its revenue came from one organization.

While the Korea council was filing as a foreign agent with the Justice Department, its lobbyists were declaring in their filings to Congress that the nonprofit had no significant foreign ownership.

«What they were telling the Department of Justice and what they were telling the IRS suggests you can’t trust either set of documents,» said Marcus Owens, a Washington tax lawyer and former Internal Revenue Service nonprofit chief who reviewed hundreds of the group’s records compiled by The Post. «The reality is the organization was designed to provide a conduit for influence.»

Alexander Strategy and Harbour lobbyists directed a steady stream of U.S. lawmakers and staffers of both parties to Seoul, where Kim squired them to meetings with top government officials. Kim traveled several times to Washington, where, according to the reports to the Justice Department, he met with prominent politicians and lawmakers.

Former president Clinton traveled to Beijing and Seoul at the invitation of the Korea council in November 2003. He appeared with Kim at the opening of the Beijing office of Korea Life Insurance Co., a Hanwha subsidiary, then traveled to Seoul for golf with Kim and meetings with political leaders.

Clinton’s representatives did not respond to requests for comment on the visit.

The publicity provided a counterweight to Kim’s troubles at home. He and other executives at Hanwha were under criminal investigation for allegedly bribing politicians in the company’s 2002 takeover of state-controlled Korea Life. Within weeks of Clinton’s visit, Kim and other Hanwha executives were barred from leaving Korea. One was later convicted in a bribery scheme. In February 2005, Kim was questioned by prosecutors but not charged.

The fact that the Korea council was a registered foreign agent was revealed in a March 2005 Post article. Some Congress members and aides who went on the trips said they had not known about the registration.

Former secretary of state Henry A. Kissinger, the best-known member of the Korea council’s board, resigned, telling aides he had not known it was a lobbying operation.

A Scant Paper Trail
Like the Korea council, the U.S.-Malaysia Exchange Association sponsored trips by members of Congress and staffers. Some began with a meeting with Kim in Korea and finished with beach time in Langkawi courtesy of the Malaysia association.

The lawmakers and aides said they believed their travel was a legitimate function of a nonprofit group. In fact, the group’s work was carried out on behalf of the Malaysian government and was funded by Malaysian business interests, both of which sought to improve the Islamic nation’s image with U.S. politicians, according to public records and people familiar with the operation of the lobbying firms.

Much remains unknown about the U.S.-Malaysia Exchange Association because the only public documents are its incorporation papers and the biannual reports it filed with the District. On its board of directors were two Malaysian ruling-party officials, Jamaludin Jarjis and Megat Junid; former Wyoming senator Malcolm Wallop (R); and Stewart of Alexander Strategy.

According to the IRS, the group never filed a tax return. The IRS said the association was granted nonprofit status, but the agency could not locate the application.

The congressional trips were organized by and billed to Alexander Strategy, according to people familiar with the operation of the lobbying firm. Alexander Strategy received $620,000 in fees that originated with Malaysian business interests and was routed through a Hong Kong firm called Belle Haven Consultants, according to documents filed by Alexander Strategy with the Justice Department. Belle Haven also paid the Harbour Group $240,000, records show.

Wallop, who was hired to lobby for Belle Haven, said in an interview this summer that the Hong Kong firm got its money from P.K. Baru Energy in Malaysia. That company, he said, was one of the businesses that wanted to improve the nation’s image in the United States after a disastrous 1998 visit by Vice President Al Gore, who walked out of a banquet to protest alleged human rights violations and anti-Semitic comments by Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad.

«They wanted to make it known that it was a more civilized and courtly place than that,» Wallop said. «A way to achieve that was to meet members of Congress.» Some lawmakers who went on the trips received briefings from Belle Haven executives about Malaysia’s strategic importance.

In their last two years of filings, Belle Haven’s U.S. lobbyists reported that the Hong Kong firm was doing its work on behalf of the Malaysian government.

In 2002, the lobbyists took large delegations to Malaysia and Langkawi, including staffers to Rep. J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.), Sen. Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), Rep. Richard K. Armey (R-Tex.) and Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.). Meeks himself and Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Tex.), both on the House Financial Services Committee, went on one of the trips and met with officials of Malaysia’s Islamic banks; the lawmakers’ expenses were paid by a Malaysian think tank.

When Mahathir arrived that spring for a visit with President Bush, he was welcomed on Capitol Hill. The prime minister met with then-Senate Majority Leader Thomas A. Daschle (D-S.D.), DeLay and Hastert, among others. And Meeks and Sessions announced the creation of a congressional caucus on Malaysia Trade, Security and Economic Cooperation.

Amid Scandal, One Last Trip
By the beginning of 2006, Alexander Strategy Group had shut down the Korea and Malaysia nonprofits — just before the lobbying firm itself went out of business because of its links to the Abramoff scandal. Buckham is referenced in the plea agreement of his former colleague, Tony Rudy, who admitted to corruption charges stemming from his work as a lobbyist and as deputy chief of staff to DeLay.

The FBI has questioned witnesses in recent months about Alexander Strategy’s use of nonprofits and its hiring of congressional spouses, including Julie Doolittle and Christine DeLay, wife of the former House majority leader.

Alexander Strategy paid Julie Doolittle about $30,000 to do bookkeeping for the Korea nonprofit. Other contracting work by Julie Doolittle, for one of Abramoff’s charities, has led investigators in the Abramoff probe to scrutinize John Doolittle’s activities, sources have told The Post.

Blackann, John Doolittle’s spokeswoman, did not respond to a question about whether the congressman knew that the Korea nonprofit, which helped pay for his February 2005 trip to Asia, was funded by a foreign corporation.

The Doolittle trip was the last one sponsored by the nonprofits as a wave of controversy about overseas junkets and lobbying abuses swept the Capitol. Also on the trip, which cost more than $80,000, were congressmen Wicker and Pomeroy, Wicker’s wife, and a Wicker aide.

The contingent spent four days in Korea before flying to Kuala Lumpur for two days, where they met the Malaysian prime minister. Pomeroy flew home, and Doolittle and his daughter, Wicker and his wife, and the aide spent three days at a resort hotel in Langkawi, an island whose beaches are rated among the world’s 10 best by a National Geographic Society publication.

Accompanying the congressmen were three Belle Haven representatives, Malaysia politician Jarjis and three lobbyists — Wallop, Alexander Strategy’s Stewart and Johnson, who by then had moved from the Harbour Group to the Glover Park Group.

Doolittle, Wicker and Pomeroy said the trip had been approved in advance by the ethics committee. But House ethics rules leave it up to individual members to determine whether a trip meets the standard of official duties.

«I was disappointed to learn — upon returning — that the groups in question had failed to properly file their status,» Pomeroy said in a statement. «Knowing what I know now, I would not have gone on these trips.»

Doolittle spokeswoman Blackann said that the first six days involved official meetings and briefings and that Doolittle paid for the recreational activities, which took place on the weekend. Doolittle declined to make available the receipts, kept in Washington, because he was campaigning in California.

Blackann also said Doolittle returned gifts received on the trip, which people familiar with the details of the trip said included a hand-tailored Korean suit for the congressman and a stylish equestrian outfit for his daughter from the Royal Polo Club in Kuala Lampur.

The spokeswoman said the congressmen also took a boat ride «to visit areas that had been ravaged by the tsunami» that had hit the South Pacific two months earlier.

A news report days after the tidal wave said Langkawi received comparatively minimal damage and «remained normal with hordes of tourists going about their holiday without any worry.»

Wicker, in an interview, acknowledged that the island visit was meant for relaxation. He said he and his wife also got massages.

The itinerary for Langkawi was to look at tsunami damage and «to have a little downtime,» Wicker said. «But the logistics of getting to the tsunami became a problem. It did become a couple of days of downtime.»

Research editor Alice Crites contributed to this report.

Towards responsible lobbying UN

Leadership and Public Policy

This report has been written in close collaboration with the United Nations Global Compact and supported by the Co-operative Financial
Services, Gap Inc., Novo Nordisk, and Telefónica. The research and report findings are based on a series of convenings and interviews with
businesses, lobbyists, civil society and public sector officials in North America, Europe, India and Brazil, backed by a review of relevant literature.
In addition, the report has benefited from a series of peer reviews from those who were part of the research, as well as additional experts.

 

The Global Compact